Nonverbal cues that convey interest in dating
Nonverbal cues that convey interest in dating - Sex cam at home
They have also had interest in particular changes that the turning points bring about, such as levels of commitment, relational satisfaction (e.g., Baxter & Bullis, 1986; Surra, 1987), self-efficacy (i.e., Docan-Morgan, 2011), and closeness (e.g., Golish, 2000; Johnson, Wittenberg, Villagran, Mazur, & Villagran, 2003; Johnson et al., 2004; Poulos, 2012).
Researchers who study turning points in relationships have been concerned primarily with identifying the types of events (e.g., an argument, a change in marital status) that create marked changes within particular relationship types, such as romantic (Dailey, Rossetto, Mc Cracken, Jin, & Green, 2012), family (Poulos, 2012), friendships (Becker et al., 2009), and teacher-student relationships (Docan-Morgan, 2011; Docan-Morgan & Manusov, 2009).Previous research (e.g., Manusov, 1990, 2002) has found that negative and/or unusual behaviors tend to instigate more conscious attributions, for instance.Of particular interest to the current study are those nonverbal cues that may work as recognizable triggers for change within relationships.In support of this, Chartrand and Bargh (1999), for example, found that synchrony of two people’s nonverbal cues can create more liking for one another.Likewise, brief and appropriate touches tend to increase positive affect between interactants (Hornik, 1992).Often, as in the studies just cited, the nonverbal cues implicated in creating relationships as a certain quality, form, or type have their effect outside of the interactants’ awareness (Knapp & Hall, 2010; i.e., people are unlikely to know that another’s touch made them like the toucher more).
There are, however, times in the course of a relationship when nonverbal cues are more notable, and they may be actively interpreted and responded to by interactants.
Our analyses revealed that judgments of the behavior/event’s valence correlated positively with judgments of their relationship, the other person, and themselves, suggesting that the affective judgment of a nonverbal turning point event may have strong implications for other important judgments.
Vocal cues seemed to be involved in events that were labeled more negatively, and touch was a cue in events labeled more positively.
The most commonly reported nonverbal cues that instigated transformation were facial expressions, eye behavior, touch, and the use of personal space.
Vocal cues (particularly silence), gestures and other kinesic cues (e.g., walking away), use of time, and attire were also mentioned.
Finally, eye behaviors were consistently a part of events that were reported to result in changes in perception. *Corresponding author at: Communication Studies, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 4231 Centennial Hall, La Crosse, WI 54601, United States.